Wednesday, December 7, 2011

IHC carried in opposition to Veena Malik’s obscene functions


A petitioner Wednesday moved Islamabad Higher Court (IHC) in opposition to Zahida alias Veena Malik contending that she ought to be attempted beneath post 294 of Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) for obscene functions, post 124-A for sedition, post 140 for sporting garb or carrying token utilized by soldier, sailor or airman and post five hundred for defamation.

Justice Muhammad Anwar Kasi with the IHC heard the situation in chamber and glued the listening to for these days on Thursday informed the petitioner Salim Ullah Khan. The petitioner informed legal court that Zahid alia Veena Malik did a naked photograph shoot for an India-based douleur journal FHM. Naked photos had been printed in the go over web page with the journal as well as carried in the e-edition with the journal.

The petitioner contended the carry out of Veena Malik is controversial and shameful for everyone in Pakistan and it ought to be stopped. Speaking to ‘The News’, individual informed that Veena Malik shown these photos at her web site as well as in the social networking web site Facebook. In 1 photograph she's sporting panties created like a Bandolier importantly of green color. She can also be carrying a grenade in her own hand knowning that as well colored green. She's carrying an inscription at her arm that's ISI in daring letters and he or she can also be proclaimed as weapon of mass destruction (WMD) from the journal. Therefore she has defamed the nation and its establishments.

The petitioner contended that Veena Malik ought to be attempted beneath post 294 that reads “Whoever, towards the annoyance of other people, - (a) does any obscene act in almost any manifeste location, or (b) sings, recites or utters any obscene songs, ballad or phrases, in or close to any manifeste location, will be punished with imprisonment of both description to get a phrase which might lengthen to 3 months, or with good, or with each.”

She ought to be attempted beneath area 124-A for sedition as it's offered within the stated post that “Whoever by phrases, both spoken or created, or by indicators, or by noticeable representation, or or else, delivers or makes an attempt to deliver into hatred or contempt, or excites or makes an attempt to excite disaffection in the direction of, the government or provincial authorities set up by legislation will be punished with imprisonment for lifestyle.”

The petitioner additional contended that Veena Malik also invoked the area five hundred of PPC for defamation that reads “whoever defames an additional shall be punished with easy imprisonment to get a phrase which might lengthen to 2 many years, or with good, or with each.”

Based on the petitioner, inscription of ISI in the Veena Malik’s arm is really a violation of area 140 PPC that prohibits sporting get or carrying token utilized by soldier, sailor or airman.

The petitioner prayed towards the court to buy Veena Malik bringing back again towards the nation and confiscation of her passport. The petitioner informed ‘The News’ that a passport utilized to become a state house and also the state might be confiscated beneath the legislation.


Post a Comment

**Feel Free to comment** You are welcome

Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Press Release Distribution